Use Clay to research accounts and relevant people. Its integration documentation shows that network data can be part of a Clay workflow; enrichment and relationship evidence need not be mutually exclusive.
Can your process distinguish a real relationship from an overlap? Can a connector confirm and approve the request? Who supplies the note, follows up and records the meeting?
The gap may be operating ownership rather than another dataset.
Orbb is relevant when the team wants relationship-led research and coordination operated consistently. Other software may support similar steps with a different internal workload. Demonstrate both on your target list.
Confirm current data exchange, integration and export capabilities rather than assuming a native connection. Use stable identifiers and retain source evidence so results can be compared.
Track new connector-confirmed paths, delivered introductions, held qualified meetings and effort. A larger table of relationships is not automatically a better commercial workflow. Keep Clay where it contributes useful research and add only what solves a demonstrated need.